Have you taken a moment to think about how much of your workweek is dedicated to meetings? Even though I juggle a Head of Product role for a software company while also running my own company on the side, I only spend about 5% of my workweek in meetings. But it wasn't always this way.
Early on, I spent 80% of my workweek in meetings. I defaulted to synchronous mode which left me in a constant reactive state. At the end of the day, I was always exhausted yet didn't feel like I had made any progress. Both my work and mental health were suffering.
This meetings by default approach wasn't working for me. To get out of this negative loop, I had to remember the primary goal of my role is to make informed decisions. I can't succeed at this if I'm allowing myself to constantly be interrupted leaving no room for deep work.
So, for the sake of doing great work and my mental health, I took a new approach. Now I spend way less time in meetings, yet I get more done, have a happier team, and feel much better. Here's what I changed:
TLDR below 👇 | Read this on the web | Subscribe​
If you don't have good meeting practices in place, there's no way not to spend all of your time in meetings. Best practices include:
If you've jumped on a call without knowing why you were there, had a meeting where everyone was talking about different topics, or members get off the call without consensus around what was actually accomplished, then you need to work on these fundamental best practices.
Instead of accepting every single meeting invite, have a set of rules to define what to say yes to. Example: I will only accept x meetings per day, during y hours, and only after determining if it is in the best format. Here are some specifics you should detail in your framework:
Personally, my meetings are limited to 2 days with a 15-30 min default. I have a limited number that I will accept per day and (unless it's a relationship-building call) the meetings are voice-only.
Setting this framework prior to being in the moment of receiving an invite is important. Instead of leaving the decision up to later, make the rules now.
Constant synchronous communication is exhausting. You have 20 minutes between two meetings so you try to write a feature ticket, but then you get a ping and check Slack instead. Next thing you know, it's time for your next meeting. You're in this endless loop of reacting and responding. This leaves no time for thinking or being proactive.
But you don't need a meeting or to instantly reply to Slack messages for communication to happen. In fact, when it comes to brainstorming and creative problem solving, it's best if each person has the time and space to work in a way that's best for them. You'll end up hearing more from the quietest people on your team because they have a chance to think over options and don't have to interrupt someone to be heard.
I'll be dedicating a full issue on asynchronous communication soon, but in the meantime, you can start with these baby steps:
​
At first, these steps may feel uncomfortable. You've probably worked reactively for a long time. However, what's comfortable isn't always what's right. Consider whether your current methods are allowing you to do your best work. Having meetings only 5% of the workweek may be too little (or too much!) for you, and that's okay. This isn't about the specific value. This is about creating a calm work environment where you don't experience constant Zoom fatigue. Imagine what you could accomplish with a little space to think.
​
People fit deep work around their meeting schedule instead of the opposite.
​
This constant reactive state isn't healthy or good for their work.
​
Reverse this approach to create a calm work environment without constant Zoom fatigue. Give yourself space to think.
​(Share this on Twitter)​
​
​
- Effortless by Greg McKeown (highly recommend reading this book)
​
Today I have a question for you! I'm excited to be working on a live course to help managers lead remote teams in positive and effective ways. I'd love to hear from you. If your manager was taking the course, what would you want them to learn? Please comment on this linked thread or reply privately to this email.
​
What did you think of this issue? What do you want me to write about next? Feel free to reply to this message or DM me on Twitter @mar15sa.
I truly appreciate you taking the time to read this. Hope you have a lovely day!
Marissa
​
9-5, Monday-Friday, in-person office work are all relics of the past. Let's revolutionize how you live by changing how you work.
I have tried just about every productivity app on the market. Most sparkle for a week, then fade from my dock. A handful, though, have earned permanent residency. These are the three tools I've personally paid for and relied on daily for years: TLDR below 👇 | Read this on the web | Subscribe 1. Todoist - The List That Never Lets Me Down It’s been so long since I started using Todoist that I don’t even remember not having it (remember when they were included in my WFH Gift Guide four years...
Hey there, If you're looking for an easy way to catch up on new AI features quickly, this is for you. Today at 9am PT, I’m hosting Cooking with AI (Live!) — a walkthrough of four AI recipes I published in May: ✅ Create Your Own Meeting Prep Bot with Zapier agents✅ Create Instant SOPs from Meeting Recordings with Gemini Gems✅ Receive Landing Page Feedback with Lex✅ Discover your Hogwarts House with ChatGPT o3 No jargon. No fluff. Come see how each one works in practice and get ideas for how to...
If you’ve been rolling your eyes at the way people talk about AI lately, you’re not alone. “Replace your team with a single prompt!” “Use this tool or get left behind!” “Why haven’t you automated everything already?” The problem isn’t AI, it’s the story around it. For people-first teams who care about doing great work and taking care of their people, the current narrative feels misaligned at best and unethical at worst. But AI adoption can be something else entirely. Used with intention, it...