Have you taken a moment to think about how much of your workweek is dedicated to meetings? Even though I juggle a Head of Product role for a software company while also running my own company on the side, I only spend about 5% of my workweek in meetings. But it wasn't always this way.
Early on, I spent 80% of my workweek in meetings. I defaulted to synchronous mode which left me in a constant reactive state. At the end of the day, I was always exhausted yet didn't feel like I had made any progress. Both my work and mental health were suffering.
This meetings by default approach wasn't working for me. To get out of this negative loop, I had to remember the primary goal of my role is to make informed decisions. I can't succeed at this if I'm allowing myself to constantly be interrupted leaving no room for deep work.
So, for the sake of doing great work and my mental health, I took a new approach. Now I spend way less time in meetings, yet I get more done, have a happier team, and feel much better. Here's what I changed:
TLDR below π | Read this on the web | Subscribeβ
If you don't have good meeting practices in place, there's no way not to spend all of your time in meetings. Best practices include:
If you've jumped on a call without knowing why you were there, had a meeting where everyone was talking about different topics, or members get off the call without consensus around what was actually accomplished, then you need to work on these fundamental best practices.
Instead of accepting every single meeting invite, have a set of rules to define what to say yes to. Example: I will only accept x meetings per day, during y hours, and only after determining if it is in the best format. Here are some specifics you should detail in your framework:
Personally, my meetings are limited to 2 days with a 15-30 min default. I have a limited number that I will accept per day and (unless it's a relationship-building call) the meetings are voice-only.
Setting this framework prior to being in the moment of receiving an invite is important. Instead of leaving the decision up to later, make the rules now.
Constant synchronous communication is exhausting. You have 20 minutes between two meetings so you try to write a feature ticket, but then you get a ping and check Slack instead. Next thing you know, it's time for your next meeting. You're in this endless loop of reacting and responding. This leaves no time for thinking or being proactive.
But you don't need a meeting or to instantly reply to Slack messages for communication to happen. In fact, when it comes to brainstorming and creative problem solving, it's best if each person has the time and space to work in a way that's best for them. You'll end up hearing more from the quietest people on your team because they have a chance to think over options and don't have to interrupt someone to be heard.
I'll be dedicating a full issue on asynchronous communication soon, but in the meantime, you can start with these baby steps:
β
At first, these steps may feel uncomfortable. You've probably worked reactively for a long time. However, what's comfortable isn't always what's right. Consider whether your current methods are allowing you to do your best work. Having meetings only 5% of the workweek may be too little (or too much!) for you, and that's okay. This isn't about the specific value. This is about creating a calm work environment where you don't experience constant Zoom fatigue. Imagine what you could accomplish with a little space to think.
β
People fit deep work around their meeting schedule instead of the opposite.
β
This constant reactive state isn't healthy or good for their work.
β
Reverse this approach to create a calm work environment without constant Zoom fatigue. Give yourself space to think.
β(Share this on Twitter)β
β
β
- Effortless by Greg McKeown (highly recommend reading this book)
β
Today I have a question for you! I'm excited to be working on a live course to help managers lead remote teams in positive and effective ways. I'd love to hear from you. If your manager was taking the course, what would you want them to learn? Please comment on this linked thread or reply privately to this email.
β
What did you think of this issue? What do you want me to write about next? Feel free to reply to this message or DM me on Twitter @mar15sa.
I truly appreciate you taking the time to read this. Hope you have a lovely day!
Marissa
β
9-5, Monday-Friday, in-person office work are all relics of the past. Let's revolutionize how you live by changing how you work.
Hey there, I've heard from a few people whoβd love to join the Work Forward Society but are looking for a lower-tier option. So, Iβm considering adding a $99/year membership that includes access to a Slack community for newsletter subscribers, but without courses, bonus resources, or events. Before moving forward, I want to gauge interest. Would this be something you'd be interested in? Let me know! Are you interested in a Slack-only community option? Yes, I'm interested! No, the current...
Hot take: Relying on a 40+ hour workweek is lazy management. For decades, weβve clung to the idea that hours worked equals productivity. But when you think about it, measuring performance by time spent at a desk isnβt just outdated, itβs counterproductive. TLDR below π | Read this on the web | Subscribe The 40-hour workweek was originally designed for industrial labor, not knowledge work. It was introduced during the early 20th century as a way to standardize labor conditions in factories,...
Hey there, Trying out something new this week. I'm sharing a quick recap of my favorite lessons, reads, and shares of the month. Let me know if this is something you'd like me to keep doing! January 2025 Recap Read this on the web | Subscribe Reads This month, I read The Nvidia Way by Tae Kim, which is about how Jensen Huang built Nvidia into a world-leading tech company. The Good: The book tells a time-pertinent story of Nvidia's rise and is a relatively quick read for a technically heavy...